1a,b). When the absolute value of asymmetry was used in our analyses instead of the signed differences, the UV chroma – body condition correlation became significant (P = 0.049). In short, individuals with higher throat UV chroma showed higher levels of left-biased directional asymmetry and were of worse body condition. We found no relationship between blue chroma and the explanatory variables

(Table 1). Finally, total brightness was positively associated with relative head size (Head PC corrected for SVL) and SVL, and negatively with ectoparasite load (Table 1, Fig. 1c–e). Individuals with brighter throats were larger with relatively larger heads and had lower ectoparasite load than their conspecifics with duller throats. The year effect was significant in all three colour variables (all P < 0.011). We showed that different Doramapimod cell line components of the throat coloration of male European green lizards are indeed connected to different individual traits. Males with high UV reflectance exhibited high level of directional asymmetry in their femoral pores and tended to have lower body condition. Individuals with high total brightness were larger, had relatively large heads and a lower ectoparasite load. Blue chroma was not related to any of the studied explanatory variables. All colour traits showed significant

annual variation. As such, our results suggest that the nuptial throat colour of male European green lizards is a complex multiple trait with different components signalling different information, and is most likely influenced by the environment. In previous BYL719 studies, we demonstrated that female European green lizards prefer males with high UV chroma (Bajer et al., 2010) and males with high UV chroma are likely to ADP ribosylation factor win aggressive encounters (Bajer et al., 2011). Hence, UV chroma is a sexually selected trait. We found a positive correlation between directional asymmetry in femoral pores and UV chroma. The evolutionary and developmental background of directional asymmetry is hard to understand without targeted experiments; it is usually interpreted as an adaptive trait (e.g.

Palmer, 2004), but it can also be a result of stress (Lens & Van Dongen 2000) or a by-product of genetic change (Bell, Khalef & Travis, 2007). In our case, where we found that femoral pore directional asymmetry is positively correlated to UV chroma – which is under positive sexual selection (Bajer et al., 2010, 2011) – we think that femoral pore directional asymmetry is adaptive. For instance, it can be a sign of ‘handedness’ during depositing femoral secretions, which transfer important information in our species (Kopena et al., 2011), similarly to what is observed in snake hemipenis use (Shine et al., 2000). However, it has been shown in other lacertids that females prefer secretion of males with symmetric femoral pores (Martin & Lopez, 2000), so the information content of femoral pore asymmetry in male L.