This suggests that neutralising antibodies represent a variable sub-set of the total toxin specific antibodies. With the exception of TxB5, toxin-neutralising

titres obtained from animal sera immunised with native fragments were low. Mild treatment with formaldehyde significantly enhanced toxin neutralising titres of all fragments with Selleckchem Capmatinib improvements of >100-fold for TxB3 and TxB4 constructs. For the formaldehyde-treated fragments, inclusion of the central toxin domains markedly increased neutralising titres compared to TxB2 which consisted of TcdB repeat regions only. Highest toxin-neutralising titres were obtained with fragment TxB4 which elicited titres >100-fold that obtained with TxB2. Of the central domain-containing fragments, TxB4 was also expressed in highest yields (approximately 30 mg purified antigen per litre) making it the preferred antigen for generating antibodies to TcdB. A panel of recombinant TcdA fragments was expressed and purified in a similar manner to that described for the TcdB fragments above (Figs. 1 and S1). In toxin neutralising assays for several of the constructs, and notably TxA2, the microscopy-based assay end point (100% cell protection) was poorly defined with

a low level of cell death occurring over several dilutions within the assay. This resulted in a poorer correlation between the neutralising titres derived by the two methods, with the ED50 values arguably providing a better relative measure of toxin-neutralising activity (Table 2 and Fig. 3). Limited Crizotinib mouse treatment of antigens with formaldehyde significantly enhanced the neutralising titre elicited by

TxA4, but the effects were less marked than those observed for the TcdB-derived constructs. The highest toxin neutralising titres were obtained with formaldehyde-treated TxA4. Yields of this fragment were lower than that for corresponding TcdB fragment with yields of 18–20 mg/l purified fragment obtained. Proteomic analysis of TxA4 by GeLC–MS/MS revealed Cediranib (AZD2171) that an impurity band of approximately 70 kDa was a breakdown product of TxA4 representing the N-terminus of the fragment. Comparison of the data within Table 1 and Table 2 with respect to the ED50 values derived for formaldehyde-treated fragments reveals significant differences with respect to the principal toxin domains contributing to the toxin-neutralising immune response. With respect to neutralisation of TcdB, serum raised against a central domain fragment (residues 767–1852; TxBcen) had >150-fold toxin-neutralising activity compared to the C-terminal fragment, TxB2. That these fragments displayed similar antibody ELISA titres (approx. 105) against TcdB suggests that this difference is not due to a poor immune response against the latter fragment.