Nishino K, Hsu FF, Turk J, Cromie MJ, Wosten MM, Groisman EA: Ide

Nishino K, Hsu FF, Turk J, Cromie MJ, Wosten MM, Groisman EA: Identification of the lipopolysaccharide AZ 628 clinical trial modifications controlled by the Salmonella PmrA/PmrB

system SBI-0206965 concentration mediating resistance to Fe(III) and Al(III). Mol Microbiol 2006,61(3):645–654.PubMedCrossRef 29. Maloy SR, Stewart VJ, Taylor RK: Genetic analysis of pathogenic bacteria: A laboratory manual. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1996. 30. Horsman SR, Moore RA, Lewenza S: Calcium chelation by alginate activates the type III secretion system in mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS One 2012,7(10):e46826.PubMedCrossRef 31. Bjarnason J, Southward CM, Surette MG: Genomic profiling of iron-responsive genes in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium by high-throughput screening of a random promoter library. J Bacteriol 2003,185(16):4973–4982.PubMedCrossRef”
“Background Aerobic anoxygenic photoheterotrophic bacteria are found selleck in large

numbers in upper ocean waters and marine sediments [1–3]. Populations of this functional group in marine ecosystems are dominated by representatives belonging to the Roseobacter clade within the class Alphaproteobacteria and the OM60/NOR5 clade within the Gammaproteobacteria[4, 5]. Due to their high abundance in oceans, aerobic anoxygenic photoheterotrophs can play a significant role in the marine carbon cycle. It was estimated that up to 5.7% of the total phototrophic energy flow in open ocean waters could rely on bacteriochlorophyll a (BChl a)-based photophosphorylation [6, 7]. The prevalence of aerobic anoxygenic photoheterotrophy in marine ecosystems is probably based on two reasons: First, the utilization

of light for mixotrophic growth enhances oxyclozanide biomass formation under conditions of carbon limitation and gives aerobic anoxygenic photoheterotrophs a selective advantage against obligate chemoheterotrophic bacteria. Secondly, utilization of solar energy by aerobic anoxygenic photoheterotrophs is largely independent from photoinhibition, which is caused by high light-intensities in surface waters and reduces the chlorophyll a-based photosynthetic activity of oxygenic photoautotrophs [6]. In order to verify both assumptions, it is of interest to elucidate which factors control the expression of the photosynthetic apparatus in cells of aerobic anoxygenic photoheterotrophs and how the energy yield generated by light-harvesting correlates with the environmental conditions. The regulation of pigment production and light-dependent growth in members of the Alphaproteobacteria has been analysed previously in numerous studies [8–13]. In most of these studies exposure to light was identified as major factor that negatively controls the expression level of photosynthetic pigments.

Comments are closed.