A plot of input TCID50 against output luciferase signal (RLU) demonstrated that 300 TCID50 was within the linear range of the assay for all A7, A9 and BPV pseudoviruses and a median 3.35 (inter-quartile range, IQR, 3.14–3.56; n = 4–9 tests per HPV type) Log10 fold over the background level of the assay; linear regression, r2 = 0.908 (IQR, 0.862–0.933) [26]. The median level of L1 protein at this level of input, determined for the A9 pseuodviruses, was 0.04 (IQR, 0.02–0.1) ng/mL. This level is at least an order of magnitude lower than that reported by Pastrana et al. [25], as expected, due to the removal of ‘cold capsids’ using the alternative protocol. BMN 673 in vitro However, a comparison of HPV16 and HPV31

neutralization titers derived using 30, 300 and 3000 input TCID50, spanning ca. 4 Log10 range of L1 protein and ca. 2 Log10 difference in particle to infectivity ratios between the standard and alternative protocol-produced stocks were not significantly different (Wilcoxon paired signed rank test and analysis of trend; p > 0.05). Thus, 300 TCID50 was deemed an appropriate pseudovirus input and used for all subsequent neutralization assays. Inter-assay reproducibility of neutralizing antibody titers was demonstrated www.selleckchem.com/products/Everolimus(RAD001).html by including

in every experiment a vaccinee serum pool control, comprising study sera selected following an initial neutralization screen against HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, HPV45, HPV52 and HPV58. Median (IQR; n) neutralization titers were as follows: HPV16 65,564 (59,607–82,880; 30); HPV31 449 (322–499; 26); HPV33 62 (57–75; 25); HPV35 21 (17–24; 26); HPV52 43 (33–59; 25); HPV58 413 (370–507; 25); HPV18 17,632 (14,660–21,593; 14); HPV39 <20 (N/A; 6); HPV45 70 (43–89; 9); HPV59 <20 (N/A; 7); HPV68 <20 (N/A; 7); BPV <20 (N/A; 19). As HPV39, 59, 68 and BPV were not neutralized by this control serum pool, neutralization tests using these pseudoviruses were repeated against all study sera to confirm the lack

of activity and included Heparin (H-4784; Sigma, UK) as a positive inhibitor control. All A7, A9 and BPV pseudoviruses were sensitive to heparin with a second median 80% inhibition concentration of 14.3 (IQR, 3.2–21.9) μg/mL [27], [28] and [29]. A small panel of nine sera samples was also retested at the end of the study against six pseudoviruses HPV16, 31, 33, 35, 52 and 58 (n = 54; linear regression, r2 = 0.983; Wilcoxon Paired Signed Rank Test for differences between groups, p = 0.629). 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test and two sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test were used to compare proportions of individuals with positive neutralizing antibody and antibody titers of vaccinees versus HPV-naïve individuals, respectively. Spearman’s and Kendall’s rank correlations and Pearson’s product-moment correlation were used to compare the neutralizing antibody titers against non-vaccine types and the corresponding vaccine type within a species group.