Other studies have also argued for a multi-component model of the TPB in the exercise

domain [26] and [27]. An extended model that incorporates insights from interviews, as well as sociodemographic characteristics, may provide a clearer picture of parents’ immunisation intentions. Indeed, the views of interviewees incorporated as items within the belief composites proved to be informative in this context: scores differed markedly between parents with maximum intentions and those who had intention scores below the possible maximum. Despite the controversy surrounding MMR, there was no significant difference between parents’ intentions to take their child for MMR CX-5461 mouse compared with dTaP/IPV. This may be explained partly by the fact that both are normally given at the same appointment and so parents’ beliefs and intentions are www.selleckchem.com/products/Perifosine.html likely to be similar. This may also reflect the possibility that there are now fewer concerns about MMR. Research published since this study has shown that there has been an increase in the proportion of mothers saying that MMR is ‘completely safe’ or ‘posing just a slight risk’ [28]. Whilst mean intention scores were generally high (1.96 for MMR and 2.30 for dTaP/IPV), only 44.2% of parents had maximum intentions to immunise their child with MMR and only

52.8% of parents had maximum intentions to immunise their child with dTaP/IPV (52.8%). Whilst direct comparisons are not possible, these figures are less than the 2006–2007 NHS reported uptake rates for MMR (73%) and isothipendyl dTaP/IPV (79%) [29]. It may be that some parents with less than maximum intentions will actually go on to have their child immunised e.g. following advice from a trusted healthcare professional. Nonetheless, potential barriers to parental uptake of both vaccinations need to be addressed in future interventions. The

finding that parental attitude was the best predictor of intention for both vaccinations is consistent with other TPB-based studies. For example, Paulussen et al. [13] and Prislin et al. [14] have demonstrated the role of parental attitude in immunisation status. In the present research, examination of the beliefs underpinning parents’ attitudes about MMR and dTaP/IPV (behavioural beliefs) revealed that parents with maximum immunisation intentions had more positive beliefs that this would prevent their child from getting the associated diseases and that this would help to eradicate them from the country. This supports research in America, where belief in the protective value of immunisation was found to Modulators contribute to positive attitudes among parents considering primary vaccinations [14].