Single-unit activity in the caudate nucleus, a primary input station of the basal ganglia, can encode a number of decision-related signals in monkeys performing the visual motion saccade task (Ding and Gold, 2010). fMRI studies revealed striatal activation in human subjects performing visual motion discrimination tasks

(Forstmann et al., 2008; van Veen et al., 2008). In contrast, the frequency of clinically observed perceptual impairments is much lower than that of motor deficits for diseases associated with basal ganglia dysfunction (e.g., Parkinson’s disease). This observation seems to argue against a major role of the basal ganglia in perceptual decision-making, selleck chemicals llc although non-motor symptoms are often under-reported or unrecognized

by clinicians (Chaudhuri et al., 2006). In this study, we used electrical microstimulation in the caudate nucleus in monkeys performing a visual motion discrimination task (Figure 1) to address three questions: (1) is there a causal link between caudate activity and perceptual decision behavior? find more (2) What are the specific decision-related computations that are influenced by caudate activity? (3) How do the basal ganglia’s roles in perceptual decisions relate to their roles in movement control? The results indicate that the basal ganglia can bias perceptual decisions toward particular alternatives. These effects are distinct from their role in movement execution. Thus, the basal ganglia STK38 appear to make multiple causal contributions to simple decisions that link sensory input to motor output. As described in previous reports (Ding and Gold, 2010, 2012), the performance of the two monkeys on the RT dots task depended critically on the strength (coherence) of the motion stimulus. Both monkeys achieved near-perfect accuracy and had the shortest RTs for coherences >20%, with steadily

decreasing accuracy and increasing RT at lower coherences (Figure 2). We fit choice and RT performance simultaneously with a drift-diffusion model (DDM; see Experimental Procedures and curves in Figure 2), and we fit choice data alone using logistic functions (see Figure S2 available online). We quantified performance using two measures estimated from the fits: choice bias, corresponding to the horizontal position of the psychometric curve (Figure 2, top panels), and discrimination threshold, corresponding to the steepness of the psychometric curve. We examined the effects of electrical microstimulation on performance in 43 sessions (n = 29 and 14, for monkey C and F, respectively). The microstimulation sites were within the general regions sampled in our previous recording study (Figure S1; Ding and Gold, 2010). The motion directions used were similar to our previous recoding studies for the caudate nucleus and FEF (Table S1; Ding and Gold, 2010, 2012).