0 and 50 0 μM AuNps-PAMAM and AuNps-citrate concentrations at 37 

0 and 50.0 μM AuNps-PAMAM and AuNps-citrate concentrations at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h. Cells were then harvested,

washed and resuspended in PBS. The uptake of AuNps was analyzed by flow cytometer (FACSCalibur, BD BioSciences, San Jose, USA). Intracellular generation of ROS was determined using oxidation of 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA, Sigma–Aldrich, USA) as previously described by Sohaebuddin et al. (2010). A DCFH-DA assay was performed ABT-199 cost for untreated cells (negative control) and compared to HepG2 cells and PBMC treated with AuNps-citrate and AuNps-PAMAM, both at 1.0 and 50.0 μM concentrations. A positive control with hydrogen peroxide was included. After 24 h of exposure to AuNps, the cells were incubated in the presence of 10 μM of DCFH-DA for 30 min at 37 °C. Nonfluorescent DCFH-DA is rapidly oxidized to highly fluorescent 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCF) by ROS. Fluorescence from oxidized DCF was determined by FACSCalibur® flow cytometer equipped with a 488 nm laser. Data were taken from 10,000 cells per sample. All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the results were

expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test, using Graph Pad Prism program software version 5. The results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. The typical Protirelin TEM images and size distribution of the nanoparticles are shown in Fig. 1(a) for AuNps-PAMAM and (b) AuNps-citrate. The average diameter of AuNps-PAMAM and AuNps-citrate ABT-263 datasheet were estimated using dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis. Zeta potential and hydrodynamic diameter were measured before and after AuNps dilution into cell culture medium supplemented with serum (10% FBS) (Table 1). After incubation of HepG2 cells and PBMC with AuNps-citrate and AuNps-PAMAM at concentrations

from 0.01 to 50.0 μM for 24 h, cell viability was determined by MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 2, the viability of HepG2 cells (Fig. 2(a), AuNps-citrate and Fig. 2(b), AuNps-PAMAM) and PBMC (Fig. 2(c), AuNps-citrate and Fig. 2(d), AuNps-PAMAM) decreased significantly when compared to negative control (p < 0.05), except at 0.01 μM for AuNps-citrate to both cells. At the highest concentration (50.0 μM), we observed a substantial viability reduction in HepG2 cells and PBMC, both with respect to the negative control. To investigate the DNA damage caused by both types of AuNps, the comet assay was performed upon incubation of the cells with 1.0 and 50.0 μM of citrate- and PAMAM-capped Nps. Table 2 and Table 3 depict the extensive damage to DNA after treatment of HepG2 and PBMC cells, respectively, with both AuNps. The damage index for AuNps-citrate at 50.0 μM and AuNps-PAMAM at 1.0 and 50.0 μM in HepG2 cells were statistically significant (p < 0.05), whereas AuNps-citrate at 1.

Comments are closed.