001). There was no significant change in the depth of selleckchem modulation for CA3 (Figure 5C; bootstrap resampling; depth of modulation during SWRs, 12% > no SWRs, 10% p > 0.2). These results indicate that during SWRs there is a transient increase in gamma

coupling between CA3 and CA1 and this synchrony between regions entrains spiking in hippocampal output area CA1. These results are particularly striking as previous work reported minimal modulation of CA1 spiking by CA3 gamma outside of SWRs (Csicsvari et al., 2003). During SWRs, neurons in CA3 and CA1 frequently fire in the context of multispike bursts (Buzsáki, 1986; Csicsvari et al., 2000), suggesting that gamma may modulate the onset of bursting. Gamma modulation was even more pronounced in CA3 when we restricted our analysis to the first spike fired by a neuron during each SWR (Figure 5D; n = 4,889 spikes from 312 neurons; Rayleigh test; mean angle = −5° p < 0.01; bootstrap resampling; depth of modulation first spike, 12% > all spikes, 8% p < 0.05). The first spikes of CA1 neurons (n = 5,620 spikes from Volasertib price 292 neurons) were also significantly phase locked, with spikes most likely to occur within a quarter cycle of the CA3 peak (Rayleigh test; mean angle = 54° p < 0.01). The preferred phases of firing for the first spikes emitted by CA3 and CA1 neurons were no different than the phase of firing

observed in the 500 ms preceding SWRs (permutation test; phase of firing before SWRs versus first spike during SWRs; CA1 p > 0.5; CA3 p > 0.1). These results suggest that gamma oscillations modulate the onset of bursting in CA3, which in turn drives bursting in CA1. The reactivation of sequences of place cells that encode previous experiences is an important feature of SWR activity (Lee and Wilson, 2002; Foster and Wilson, 2006; Karlsson and Frank, 2009). As experimentalists, we can decode memory replay by imposing an external clock and dividing each replay crotamiton event into fixed

sized bins. However, the hippocampus does not have access to this external clock, so the mechanisms that coordinate memory replay must reflect internal processes that maintain precisely timed sequential neural activity across hundreds of milliseconds. We hypothesized that gamma oscillations during SWRs serve as an internal clocking mechanism to bind distributed cell assemblies together and pace the sequential reactivation of stored memories. If gamma oscillations serve as an internal clock to coordinate replay, then two conditions must be met. First, given that we can decode replay events using a precise external clock, the variability in gamma frequency (Atallah and Scanziani, 2009) must be relatively small. Indeed, we found that there was a strong correlation between the relative timing of spikes as measured by an external clock or by the phase of gamma (Figure 6A; Spearman correlation, ρ = 0.98).