1 to 1.2 eV. Obviously, this cathode

interface modification greatly reduces the electron injection barrier, which should be beneficial for the improvement of PCE. The complete structure of our inverted this website organic solar cells is shown in Figure 1b. The interface modification was also carried out by taking multiple contact angle measurements from few locations on the substrates, with and without interface modification. Contact angle measurements were performed to confirm that interface modification was present on the ITO film. Six separate contact angle determinations were performed on each sample. Without interface modification, the surface of ZnO after oxygen plasma had a low wetting angle to DI water (~26°) – showing a hydrophilic (oleophobic) surface. Selleck Epoxomicin It is worth noting that such a low contact angle indicates a higher surface MK-2206 concentration energy, which is characteristic for polar surfaces. The creation of the interface modification layer was confirmed from the data, which demonstrates the enhancement in contact angle (hydrophobic/oleophilic surface) after surface modification (~68°). iii-AFM To further characterize the formation of interface modification, atomic force microscopy

imaging is performed. Figure 3 illustrates the surface topography of ZnO and ZnO:Cs2CO3 films on ITO. As shown in Figure 3a, neat ZnO exhibits a smooth surface with a root mean square (RMS) roughness of 2 nm. The image of the ZnO surface was somewhat variable. This is most likely due Carnitine dehydrogenase to the fact that the sol-gel process results in a fine-grained polycrystalline film with an exposed crystal surface having various different orientations. On the other hand, some informative distinctions were observed optically, where the interface modification could be seen (Figure 3b,c,d,e,f). The interface modification by ZnO:Cs2CO3 layer (Figure 3b) shows a slightly higher RMS roughness. The RMS roughness

of the modified surface (3:1) is 4.7 nm, which is more than twice that of the neat ZnO (Figure 3a). The roughness becomes higher as the blend ratio changes from 3:1 to 2:1, leading to RMS roughness of 9.5 nm (Figure 3c). However, as we can see from Figure 3d, the RMS roughness decreases to 6 nm as the blend ratio changes from 2:1 to 1:1. The lowest roughness is obtained with the blend ratio of 1:2, where the RMS roughness is around 2.75 nm (Figure 3e). As a result, the surface morphology of interface modified (1:2) demonstrates a good and smother surface. Finally, as the amount of Cs2CO3 becomes larger, the roughness gets higher. This can be seen from Figure 3f, where the RMS roughness jumps to 10.41 nm. For more information on surface topography, please see Supporting Information. From these AFM images, one finds that there is a clear hint that modified surface gives slightly rough topography.