4 examined three areas relevant to consideration of the use of antihypertensive therapy that are summarized below: 1. Antihypertensive therapy and development of ESKD

in people with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Only three RCTs were identified as being of sufficient size and length of follow up namely ABCD, UKPDS and HOPE. Of these ABCD did not include ESKD as an endpoint. In the UKPDS study the prevalence of ESKD was less than 2% with a relative risk for tight control of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.015–2.21) with similar results for death from kidney failure.8 The HOPE Study demonstrated that there was a non-significant relative risk reduction for the requirement for renal dialysis among people treated with ramipril.18 As a consequence of the above two trials, CB-839 cost Newman et al.4 concluded that there was no evidence of a beneficial effect of antihypertensive therapy on the development of ESKD. 2. Antihypertensive therapy and change in GFR in people with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Three placebo controlled trials in normotensive people were identified.14,25,69 Newman et al.4 considers the data are inconclusive. No appropriate trials comparing different antihypertensive agents and intensive versus moderate BP control were identified. However, later analysis of the ABCD trial70 selleck chemical indicated a significant effect of intensive therapy on the progression

from microalbuminuria to clinical proteinuria, however, there was no change in creatinine clearance and no difference between ACEi

and CCB. Two placebo controlled trials in hypertensive people were identified.71,72 Newman et al.4 concludes that the limited evidence indicates kidney function to remain stable in hypertensive people with type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria treated with ACEi compared with a decline in the placebo group (36 month follow up). The Parving et al.72 study also indicated a significant reduction in the rate of progression to clinical proteinuria with ARB treatment however, this was not associated with a significant decline in creatinine clearance. Two trials were identified that compared intensive and moderate BP control in hypertensive people with type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria.8,73 Urocanase However, the UKPDS study was unable to differentiate between normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric subgroups. In the large ABCD study no significant difference in creatinine clearance was found in either normoalbuminuric or microalbuminuric subgroups. Three appropriate trials were identified comparing different antihypertensive agents in hypertensive people with type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria.73–75 None of these trials showed significant differences in GFR or creatinine clearance. 3. Antihypertensive therapy and development of clinical proteinuria in people with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Three randomized placebo-controlled trials in normotensive people with type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria were identified.