9 % FM: – 0 5 % Strength: + 2 3 % average Nissen 1996 [7] Untrain

9 % FM: – 0.5 % Strength: + 2.3 % average Nissen 1996 [7] Untrained college-aged males Monitored progressive resistance training No Yes 3 weeks, 1.5 or 3 grams per day HMB-Ca No TOBEC for total FFM and FM Strength: Average weight lifted during last 3 working sets of upper and lower body exercises FFM: + 0.6 % FM: No Effect Strength: +2.6 to 17.4 % depending on lift Jowko 2001 [10] Active, college-aged males Monitored progressive resistance training No No 3 weeks, 3 grams per day HMB-Ca 20 grams creatine

per day for 7 days followed by 10 grams per day for 14 days BIA Strength: Cumulative 1-RM of major lifts (Squat, Bench Press, Clean) FFM: + 0.6 % FM: – 0.7 % Strength: + 9 % Kreider 1999[15] Resistance trained, college-aged males males with > 1 year experience Not monitored: Instructed not to change current this website individualized training regimens No No 28 days, 3 or 6 grams per day HMB-Ca No DXA for: LBM and FM Strength: Bench Press and Leg Press LBM: No Effect FM: No Effect Strength: No Effect Gallagher 2000[12] Untrained college-aged males

Monitored progressive resistance training No No 8 weeks, 3 or 6 grams per day HMB-Ca No 7 site Skin Fold Isometric and Isokinetic testing, Non-specific to training stimulus FFM: + 3 % FM: – 1.6 % Strength: +2-3.5 % No differences between 3 and 6 g Panton 2000[20] Men and women, divided into untrained and resistance trained (> 6 months), 20–40 yrs of age Monitored high intensity progressive resistance training No No 4 weeks, 3 grams per day HMB-Ca {Selleck Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleck Antiinfection Compound Library|Selleck Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleck Antiinfection Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleckchem Antiinfection Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleckchem Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|buy Anti-infection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library ic50|Anti-infection Compound Library price|Anti-infection Compound Library cost|Anti-infection Compound Library solubility dmso|Anti-infection Compound Library purchase|Anti-infection Compound Library manufacturer|Anti-infection Compound Library research buy|Anti-infection Compound Library order|Anti-infection Compound Library mouse|Anti-infection Compound Library chemical structure|Anti-infection Compound Library mw|Anti-infection Compound Library molecular weight|Anti-infection Compound Library datasheet|Anti-infection Compound Library supplier|Anti-infection Compound Library in vitro|Anti-infection Compound Library cell line|Anti-infection Compound Library concentration|Anti-infection Compound Library nmr|Anti-infection Compound Library in vivo|Anti-infection Compound Library clinical trial|Anti-infection Compound Library cell assay|Anti-infection Compound Library screening|Anti-infection Compound Library high throughput|buy Antiinfection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library ic50|Antiinfection Compound Library price|Antiinfection Compound Library cost|Antiinfection Compound Library solubility dmso|Antiinfection Compound Library purchase|Antiinfection Compound Library manufacturer|Antiinfection Compound Library research buy|Antiinfection Compound Library order|Antiinfection Compound Library chemical structure|Antiinfection Compound Library datasheet|Antiinfection Compound Library supplier|Antiinfection Compound Library in vitro|Antiinfection Compound Library cell line|Antiinfection Compound Library concentration|Antiinfection Compound Library clinical trial|Antiinfection Compound Library cell assay|Antiinfection Compound Library screening|Antiinfection Compound Library high throughput|Anti-infection Compound high throughput screening| No Underwater

Weighing Bench Press and Leg Press 1-RM FFM: +.5 kg FM: – .6 % Strength: +3-15 % Hoffman 2004[19] Methane monooxygenase College Football players Football camp, not controlled by investigators No No 10 days, 3 grams per day HMB-Ca No Not Measured Wingate Power No Effects Kraemer 2009[13] Recreationally active, college-aged males periodized resistance training split Yes Yes 12 weeks, 3 grams per day HMB-Ca 14 grams arginine and 14 grams glutamine per day DXA for LBM and FM and Limb Circumference Squat and Bench Press 1RM Vertical Jump LBM: + 40% FM: -40 % Strength: 50 % Power: +85 % Thomson 2009[22] Trained college-aged males Non Monitored Assigned progressive resistance training program with 84 % compliance No No 9 weeks, 3 grams per day HMB-Ca No BIA Bench Press, Preacher Curl, and Leg Extension 1-RM FFM: 0.4 FM: – 3.8 Strength: 1.1-9.0 depending on lift Portal 2011[23] Elite adolescent volleyball players 13.5-18 yrs of age Combination of progressive, resistance, and endurance exercise Not reported No 7 weeks, 3 grams per day HMB-Ca No DXA Power on Wingate Strength of Bench Press and Leg Press Fat: PL = +3.5% Vs. HMB= −6.6% FFM: PL= no change Vs. HMB= +3.

Comments are closed.