After 6 months treatment the ARB treatment group had a reduced albumin excretion rate and ACR, while the ACEi was higher.94 However, the baseline conditions differed between treatment groups and the majority of individuals were normoalbuminuric thus the relevance of the outcomes for individuals with microalbuminuria is questionable. The GEMINI trial involved 1235 Selleck RAD001 people with type 2 diabetes with elevated BP under either an ACEi or ARB hypertension

treatment randomized for treatment with two different β-blockers (carvedilol and metoprolol).95 A post hoc analysis of differential effects of the β-blockers on the progression of albuminuria indicated a greater reduction in microalbuminuria for carvedilol compared with metoprolol. In those with normoalbuminuria fewer progressed to microalbuminuria on carvedilol. These 5-Fluoracil concentration effects were not related to BP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated only baseline urine ACR and treatment were significant predictors of changes in albuminuria. In a separate analysis the presence of metabolic syndrome at baseline corresponded with an OR of 2.68 (95% CI: 1.36–5.30) over the duration of the study. The DETAIL study involved 250 people with type 2

diabetes with mild to moderate hypertension and eGFR ≥ 70 mL/min per 1.73 m2 from 6 European countries.96 The study compared an ARB and an ACEi treatment over 5-years. After 5 years the difference in eGFR between the ARB and the ACEi was −3.1 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and was insignificant. The mean annual declines in eGFR were 3.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for the ARB and 3.3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for the ACEi. These results were considered by the authors to be similar to eGFR decline reported in the IRMA 2, IDNT, and RENAAL studies and compare to an expected untreated type 2 diabetes the annual decline in the order of 10 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Telmisartan was

concluded to be not inferior to enalapril in providing long-term renoprotection. However, the results do not necessarily apply to more advanced nephropathy but support clinical equivalence of ARB and ACEi in persons with conditions that place them at high risk for CV events. The large ONTARGET trial comparing ARB and ACEi of in excess of 25 000 participants included a large proportion with diabetes and microalbuminuria.97 Relevant secondary outcomes are kidney impairment and kidney failure requiring dialysis. The only significant differences between treatments (ACEi, ARB and ACEi + ARB) were for increased kidney impairment in the combination therapy compared with the ACEi. Further analysis of renal outcomes,98 indicated a significantly higher increase in ACR in the ACEi treatment group compared with the ARB and ACEi + ARB (31% vs 24% and 21%). The risk of developing new microalbuminuria was not different between ACEi and ARB treatment groups, but was significantly lower in the combination treatment group.