Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 4.00 (GraphPad Software). Linear data was expressed as means ± SEM, whereas logarithmic data was expressed as geometric means ± 95% confidence interval. Statistical differences between groups were

calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison posttest to compare groups by pairs. Differences between groups in relation to time were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s posttest for comparison of pairs. Paired Student’s t-test was used to compare two groups. Differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05. Multiple types of YC-NP emulsified with different surfactants were learn more screened for low cell toxicity, efficient cellular uptake, and good protein adsorption (data not shown). Three different YC-NP were selected that met these criteria: YC-SDS (yellow carnauba-sodium dodecil sulphate), YC-NaMA (sodium myristate acetate), and YC-Brij700-chitosan. The latter NP was emulsified

with Brij700, a surfactant with a long carbon chain (C18) that contains 100 ethylenoxide (EO) units, and then mixed with medium molecular weight chitosan during the oil-in-water melting process to provide the NP surface with a positive charge. The zeta potential (Z) of the different YC-NP, a measurement in mV of the magnitude of repulsion or attraction between particles, was: YC-SDS, −47.7; YC-NaMA, −64.1; and YC-Brij700chitosan, +19.5. The size of the NP ranged between 387.0 and 675.0 nm, with mean size ± SD for each NP as follows: YC-SDS, 406.5 ± 27.94, n = 6; YC-NaMA, 478.8 ± 100.9, n = 5; and YC-Brij700-chitosan, 588.0 ± 123.0, n = 2. The NP polydispersity index (PDI) Rucaparib solubility dmso was YC-SDS: 0.21 ± 0.033; YC-NaMA: 0.17 ± 0.05; and YC-Brij700chitosan 0.41 ± 0.23. Representative SEM pictures of YC-SDS, YC-NaMA, and YC-Brij700chitosan particles are shown

in Fig. 1A. inhibitors Nanoparticles showed high stability at 5 °C 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl and 25 °C in terms of particle size, ZP, and viscosity for up to 12 months after preparation ( Fig. 1B), demonstrating good colloidal stability. Zeta potential of the Ags, as expected, varied widely depending on the pH due to the amphoteric characteristics of the proteins. However, all three Ags (BSA, TT, and gp140) showed negative ZP at pH ranging between 7 and 8. Interestingly, whereas the ZP at this pH interval was about −10 mV for BSA and gp140, that of TT reached −30 mV. These results suggest that, at physiological pH, adsorption of Ags to the NP may vary depending on both NP and protein surface charge. However, all three Ags bound to anionic and cationic NP (data not shown and Fig. 1C). Binding of gp140 to negatively (YC-SDS and YC-NaMA) and positively (YC-Brij700-chitosan) charged NP is shown in Fig. 1C as indicated by the change in ZP of NP after incubation with gp140. We believe that association of these Ags with the YC-NP may be dominated by both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions [25].