For the purpose of the present research question, the data from the randomised trial are analysed as a cohort study, because the trial showed no differences between the usual care group and the physical therapy group (van Rijn et al 2007). Nevertheless, in the present study the interventions were also considered as potential prognostic factors. Patients with a lateral ankle sprain were eligible for this study if they were aged between 18 and 60 years and their first visit to the physician was within 1 week of the injury. Patients were excluded if they had a history of an injury of the same ankle during the previous two years or if they had ever had a fracture of the

same learn more ankle. All participants were asked to complete a baseline questionnaire containing questions about potential prognostic factors (Appendix 1, see the eAddenda for Appendix 1.) The following characteristics were measured at baseline: demographic factors (age, gender, body mass index), clinical factors (setting, intervention, injury grade, earlier injury, self-reported

swelling, Ankle Function Score measured according to de Bie et al 1997, instability, and pain at rest, during walking and running), and ankle load factors (ankle load during work and ankle load during hobby/sports). Ankle load was determined by asking, Osimertinib ‘Are your working/sporting tasks aggravating for your ankle?’ Loading was categorised as none, light, or heavy. The outcome measures evaluated by questionnaires at 3 and 12 months follow-up were subjective recovery, instability, re-sprains, ankle Ketanserin function, and pain at rest, during walking, and during running. Subjective recovery was measured on a numerical rating scale (range 0–10, where 0 = no recovery and 10 = full recovery.) Subjective instability was measured using six

questions about instability and a feeling of giving way: the degree of a feeling of giving way during walking on flat ground, walking on uneven ground, walking uphill, walking downhill, and sport activities (each measured on a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10), and instability (measured on a 6-point scale from ‘never a feeling of giving way’ to ‘a feeling of giving way with every step’.) The outcome ‘instability’ was dichotomised as being ‘present’ if at least one answer to these six questions was positive, or ‘absent’ if the answers were negative on all six questions. Participants were asked whether any re-sprains had occurred, so re-sprains were self-reported. Ankle function was measured using the Ankle Function Score, which consists of five categories: pain, instability, weight bearing, swelling, and gait pattern. In each category, the number of points can be summed to a maximum overall score of 100, which indicates minimal severity (de Bie et al 1997). Pain intensity was measured on a numerical rating scale (range 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = unbearable pain.