Interestingly, the antibody levels in the 2 pigs which were not protected from Benin 97/1 challenge in experiment 2 (Fig. 6B) had either the highest (1844) or the lowest (1811)
anti-ASFV antibody titre before the challenge. On the other hand pig 184 from experiment 3 had a much lower antibody titre at challenge (day 41) than these unprotected pigs in experiment 2, but was protected. The pig which was euthanized following boost (1822) had the lowest antibody titres at the time of boost (Fig. 6B), in contrast pig 76 from experiment 3 was protected from OURT88/1 boost despite a lack of apparent antibody response (Fig. 6C). In this study we have demonstrated that experimental immunisation of pigs with a non-virulent ASFV genotype I isolate from find more Portugal, OURT88/3, followed by a boost with a closely related virulent isolate, OURT88/1, can induce protective buy Screening Library immunity in
European domestic pigs against challenge from two virulent African isolates of ASFV. These included a genotype I isolate from West Africa, Benin 97/1 and a genotype X isolate from Uganda, virulent Uganda 1965. Overall 85.7% and 100% pigs were protected from Benin 97/1 and Uganda 1965 ASFV challenge respectively. More than 78% of pigs challenged with Benin 97/1 and 50% of pigs challenged with Uganda 1965 were completely protected by not showing any sign of disease or development of viraemia. Phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated sequences of 125 genes conserved between 12 complete genome sequences showed that the OURT88/3 and Benin 97/1 sequences are greater than 95% identical across these genes [15] and [16]. Although the virulent Uganda 1965 isolate is placed in VP72 genotype X, it falls within the same clade as the genotype I isolates (Chapman et al., unpublished observations). This is the first clear demonstration of induction of cross-protective
immunity against challenge with more distantly related virulent strains of ASFV. It has been reported previously that the pigs which recover from less virulent strains of ASFV are resistant to challenge with the same or very Rutecarpine closely related virus strains [1], [3] and [14]. The genotypes of the strains used in these studies were not defined. The ASFV OURT88/3 strain was isolated from Ornithodoros erraticus ticks in Portugal and described not to cause clinical signs or viraemia [2]. Interestingly, the inoculation of virulent OURT88/1 virus following OURT88/3 immunisation, could protect pigs from the disease, and also further stimulated development of anti-ASFV immune responses. This indicates that the inoculation of OURT88/1 acts to boost the immune response ( Fig. 4 and Fig. 6) and this might be required for inducing sufficient ASFV isolate-cross-protective immunity. However, further experiments are required to clarify this.