\n\nMethod\n\nA survey

was mailed in 2007 to a stratified random sample of 1,000 U. S. primary care physicians, selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Participants were classified into three groups according to agreement or disagreement with two statements: “A physician should never do what he or she believes is morally wrong, no matter what experts say,” and ” Sometimes physicians have a professional ethical obligation to provide medical services even if they personally believe it would be morally wrong to do so.”\n\nResults\n\nThe response rate was 51% (446/879 delivered questionnaires). Forty-two percent and 22% believed they are never and sometimes, respectively, obligated to do what they personally believe is wrong, and 36% agreed with both statements. Physicians MGCD0103 concentration who are more religious are more likely to believe that physicians PF-00299804 in vivo are never obligated to do what they believe is wrong (58% and 31% of those with high and low intrinsic religiosity, respectively; multivariate odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.2). Those with moral objections to any of three controversial practices were more likely

to hold that physicians should never do what they believe is wrong.\n\nConclusion\n\nA substantial minority of physicians do not BMS-777607 believe there is ever a professional obligation to do something they personally believe is wrong.”
“The effects of prepartum supplementary feeding on the productive and reproductive performance were investigated using grazing gestating Bunaji cows with an average initial body weight of 294.50 +/- 3.75 kg. Twenty cows were allocated to a completely randomized design, with five animals per treatment. The treatments were: A, range grazing (RG); B, RG + 100% corn bran (CB); C, RG + 60% CB + 40% palm kernel cake (PKC), and D, RG + 60% CB + 40% dried brewer’s grains (DBG).

The average daily gains (ADG) and body condition scores (BCS) of supplemented cows were significantly better than the non-supplemented cows. Postpartum weight loss was markedly reduced in supplemented cows compared to their non-supplemented counterparts. Mean milk offtake and mean milk yield per lactation were significantly lower in non-supplemented cows than the supplemented ones. Among the supplemented cows, ADG, BCS, mean milk offtake and milk yield per lactation were significantly better for cows on treatments C and D than those on treatment B. Though insignificant, longest lactation length (LL) and shortest calving interval were obtained for supplemented cows. Calf’s birth weight was similar among the treatments. Milk yield was significantly influenced (R-2 = 0.8601) by cow’s weight, BCS and LL.