Techniques available for preoperative staging include endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission Rucaparib order tomography (PET). Three excellent recent reviews have evaluated the applicability, efficacy and deficiencies of these procedures.63–65 The overall accuracy of rectal EUS in the T staging of tumors ranges

from 63% to 96%. Variability between studies is attributable to operator experience, previous radiotherapy and proportions of stenosing tumors.63,65 The greatest inaccuracy arises in distinguishing between T2 and T3 tumor because of difficulty in differentiating peritumoral inflammation from local extension of the tumor.64 The accuracy of nodal staging by EUS ranges from 63% to 86%; the average of 73% is lower than that of 82% for T stage.63,65 Differences in results among studies may arise from differences in criteria used to define nodal metastases or variations in the experience of observers. EUS has the advantages of being relatively inexpensive, widely available and simple to perform.

With CT staging the accuracy of T-staging varies widely (52% to 94%) with greater accuracy being achieved in more locally advanced tumors.64,65 Accuracy rates vary

according SB525334 in vivo to the CT technology used. Multi-detector row CT scanners offering improved quality of images and better spatial resolution are expected to improve diagnostic accuracy in T staging.66 The accuracy of nodal staging by CT has been shown to range from 54% to 85%,64,65 with sensitivity varying between 22% and 84%; this is a result of the lack of selleck chemicals satisfactory criteria for identifying metastatic involvement of nodes.66 The situation may be improved by the use of multiplanar reconstruction images. In comparison to other imaging techniques, CT has its widest application in the identification of systemic metastases. When first introduced, MRI using a body coil achieved T staging accuracies ranging from 59% to 88%. This improved greatly, to 71% to 91%, with the advent of the endorectal coil to achieve detailed imaging of the rectal wall.64,65 However, placement of the endorectal coil may be difficult in stenosing or low rectal tumors, and inter-observer differences in interpretation remain problematic.64 As with CT, the main inaccuracy in T staging by MRI lies in differentiating T2 from T3 because of the difficulty of distinguishing between inflammation alone versus tumor invasion in the rectal wall.