The results that blockage of RAGE did not affect internalization are consistent with those of Schmidt

et al.,18 who characterized RAGE as a signal transduction receptor rather than as a clearance receptor. Accordingly, RAGE mediates long-lasting interactions with its ligands and as a result transcription https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ensartinib-x-396.html of genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines is activated.19,20 These cytokines and other factors may cause the up-regulation of other receptors able to recognize and incorporate AGEs. Further experiments using confocal microscopy are under way to delineate the uptake of OVA and AGE-OVA. When loaded on mature DCs, both allergens induced T-cell proliferation, even in non-allergic healthy donors. However, these donors were not naïve to OVA because of natural exposure to hen’s eggs in everyday life. Although there was no difference in proliferation induced by OVA- or AGE-OVA-pulsed DCs, we observed a shift towards Th2 cytokine production after stimulation of CD4+ T cells with AGE-OVA-loaded compared with OVA-loaded mature DCs. This Th2 bias was linked to the high https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Belinostat.html production of IL-6 by AGE-OVA-pulsed DCs compared with OVA-pulsed DCs. The enhanced Th2 response induced by AGE-OVA-pulsed DCs could still be observed after addition of polymyxin

B, indicating that the allergens themselves and not LPS contamination were responsible for the cytokine production. Additionally, any LPS effect on the maturation of DCs could be neglected as DCs were brought to maximal maturity by the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The finding that T cells were activated similarly by the two antigens in terms of proliferation indicates that differences occurring later

in cytokine production may depend not only on the activation potential of antigens in general, for example increased IL-6 production by AGE-OVA-pulsed DCs, but also on the quality, route or concentration of antigens inducing a Th1 or Th2 response. The finding that AGE-OVA second induces a Th2 response compared with OVA, even in non-allergic and non-atopic donors, might indicate that AGE-OVA has a greater potential to induce an allergic immune response leading to IgE production. In an in vivo mouse model, AGE-OVA also induced higher titres of specific IgE compared with OVA (Toda et al., unpublished data). In further experiments we analysed the expression of RAGE on immature DCs and found that it is up-regulated by AGE-OVA compared with native OVA and that the stimulation of immature DCs with AGE-OVA induced activation of the proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB.