The student survey results were also analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. There were no dropouts in this study, but four student participants did not consent to being observed by the blinded outcome BIBW2992 order assessor. Therefore, the participant number for this outcome measure was 20, not 24. One educator did not complete the survey. Eight students did not complete the end-of-unit satisfaction survey. The six blinded assessors had more than 5 years of experience in clinical practice and

clinical education. They had current or recent experience with physiotherapy students, either teaching on-campus and/or as a clinical educator. The 14 clinical educators were mostly aged between 20 and 30 years with a Bachelor-level qualification. Their time in clinical practice and in clinical education ranged from < 1 to 10 years. The average number of students they had educated per year before the study ranged from one to 12, indicating variable experience levels. Only one clinical educator felt ‘very confident’ in their clinical education skills and none had prior experience with peer-assisted learning. Students (n = 24) were mostly aged between 18 and 25 years and two-thirds had completed two years of tertiary education prior to clinical placements (Table 2). There were

no significant differences in the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice scores between the peer-assisted learning and traditional models, whether awarded by the Talazoparib cell line blinded assessor, the supervising clinical educator or the students. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice scores between Edoxaban the peer-assisted learning and traditional models when analysed by clinical area (Table

3). Analysis of educator workload statistics revealed no significant between-group differences in any of the measured outcomes (Table 4), with the exception of time spent on direct teaching and non-student-related quality assurance tasks (eg, projects designed to improve the quality of patient care). Despite minimal significant differences in their daily workload data, educators reported that they were more satisfied with the balance of their workload in the traditional model (Table 4). On completion of both models, clinical educators reported that they were less satisfied with the peer-assisted learning model overall, and in the areas of student anxiety, personal stress, time available for client service and their ability to observe and gauge students’ clinical ability (Table 5). When asked to rate on a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), clinical educators had a neutral response about their confidence in facilitating the peer-assisted learning strategies during the designated peer-assisted learning block (median 3, IQR 3 to 4).