The study hypothesis was that BSA and citrate

adsorption, which results in ligand-induced metal release, influence the surface energy of the stainless steel surface. This information on wettability and surface properties could provide further information about metal release mechanisms and link the surface biochemical aspects with corrosion and metal release processes. Differences in surface energies calculated from contact angle measurements, surface oxide composition, and released iron from stainless steel grade AISI 304 immersed in complexing solutions containing bovine serum albumin or citric acid were studied. The influence of both polar and non-polar surface energies was studied in relation to metal release by using both the van Oss et al. [38] and [39] and the Della Volpe et al. [40] methods. Based on the Young–Dupreé equation, http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ch5424802.html the free surface energy of a solid material (γTOT) and its acid-base (γ+ and γ−) and Lifshitz-van der Waals (γLW) components of the surface free energy [38], [39] and [41] are assumed to be additive according to Eq. (1) [41]: equation(1) γTOT=γLW+γ+γ Contact angle measurements between a liquid of known properties

and a surface can be used to calculate the free surface energy components by utilizing at least three liquids with different properties, and solving three equations of this type (2) [38] and [39]: equation(2) (1+cosθ)=2(γSLWγLLW+γS+γL−+γS−γL+) Here, θ is GS-1101 cell line the contact angle and S and L denote the solid and liquid phase, respectively. At least one of the liquids should be

non-polar (γ+ = γ− = 0), giving the γLW component of the solid surface directly. However, there are conflicting opinions in the literature on how to perform these types of measurements and calculations. The method of van Oss et al. (vOCG) [38] and [39] has been criticized by Della Volpe et al. [40] and [42] for the choice of liquids used for contact angle measurements, selected values for their corresponding free energies, and the direct comparison between acid and basic properties. This will however not be discussed in detail in this paper. We therefore report surface Selleck CHIR-99021 energy values calculated using both the vOCG and the Della Volpe et al. methods to allow relative comparisons between the methods for differently treated surfaces. Water, formamide and glycerol, or water, formamide and diiodomethane combinations were selected to obtain well-conditioned sets of equations [40]. Surface tension parameters for the different liquids are given in Table 1. A Matlab (version 7.8) program using a least-square method was used for solving non-linear equations for each liquid (Eq. (2)). Stainless steel AISI 304 (Table 2) coupons approximately sized 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm × 0.1 cm and with a total surface area of 1.98–2.