When osteoclasts tunnel through cortical bone they may be less likely to encounter bisphosphonate within the matrix they http://www.selleckchem.com/products/VX-809.html engulf so remodeling continues. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, binds to RANKL and prevents its binding with

RANK receptors on osteoclasts and osteoclast precursors and so inhibits the synthesis, activity, and lifespan of existing osteoclasts [9], [10] and [11]. It is not bound to bone and so is widely distributed throughout the skeleton [12]. It inhibits remodeling and reduces porosity to a greater extent than alendronate in non-human primates [13]. In mice, osteoprotegerin (OPG), the endogenous inhibitor of RANKL, reduces porosity and preserves bone strength more than either alendronate or zoledronic acid [14]. Both cortical and trabecular

bone determine bone strength; 80% of fractures in women over 65 years are non-vertebral [15], 80% of bone is cortical, and 70% of all appendicular bone loss is cortical and occurs mainly by intracortical remodeling [3]. The resulting increase in intracortical Selleckchem BI-2536 porosity reduces bone strength exponentially [3]. We hypothesized that the greater inhibition of remodeling with denosumab in postmenopausal women will result in a greater reduction in porosity than achieved using alendronate, while effects on trabecular bone will not differ. The design and primary results of the study are published [11]. This was a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study of 247 postmenopausal women aged 61 ± 5 years with lumbar spine or total hip bone mineral density (BMD) T-score between − 2.0 and − 3.0 SD assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Treatments were denosumab 60 mg every 6 months, alendronate 70 mg weekly, or placebo. Of the 247 subjects randomized, 146

had results at month 12 as measured by StrAx1.0 software. Missing data was due to movement artifacts or missing serial measurements. The threshold for exclusion of images due to motion artifact is lower than when measuring other parameters such as density. The exclusion of images because of artifacts Erastin concentration was done blind to treatment allocation. There were no baseline demographic, biochemical, or densitometric differences between subjects with or without available data and the entire cohort. All subjects received calcium (≥ 500 mg/day) and vitamin D supplements based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) at screening. The daily dose was ≥ 400 IU if 25[OH]D was > 20 ng/mL (> 50 nmol/L) or ≥ 800 IU if 25[OH]D was 12 to 20 ng/mL (30 to 50 nmol/L). Women were included if high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT, XtremeCT®) could be performed on at least one wrist.